Overview
This is a practical engineering blueprint with clear components but no empirical evaluations; it is actionable for prototyping yet lacks measured performance evidence.
Citations4
Evidence Strength0.30
Confidence0.85
Risk Signals13
Trust Signals
Findings with numeric evidence: 0/5
Findings with evidence refs: 5/5
Results with explicit delta: 0/0
Reproducibility
Status: No open assets linked
Open source: Unknown
At A Glance
Cost impact: 40%
Production readiness: 60%
Novelty: 50%
Why It Matters For Business
Gives a reusable engineering blueprint to run reliable, auditable multi-agent automation across existing enterprise systems without retraining models.
Who Should Care
Summary TLDR
This paper presents a practical engineering blueprint for building multi-agent systems driven by large language models (LLMs). It specifies modular components (Planner, Executor, Verifier, Agent Units, Matchers), prompt strategies (ReAct variants, Programmable Prompt, ConvPlanReAct), tool handling (tool schema + Toolbox Refiner), and two memory levels (short per-task memory and episodic vector DB). The design highlights five multi-agent patterns (Independent, Sequential, Joint, Hierarchical, Broadcast), human-in-loop options, and resume/restart behavior for production-grade automation. No new model weights or benchmark experiments are provided.
Problem Statement
Current LLMs are powerful but lack direct access to proprietary systems and reliable multi-step execution. Organizations need a reusable engineering pattern to compose narrow expert agents, orchestrate tools and memory, verify results, and scale multi-agent workflows in enterprise IT environments.
Main Contribution
A modular agent engineering framework that separates Planning, Execution, and Verification and fits mixed modern/legacy IT.
ConvPlanReAct: a conversational extension of ReAct/PlanReAct that adds dialog-aware steps and explicit next-agent selection (@AgentName).
Key Findings
Narrow, persona-like agents perform more reliably than broad agents.
Multi-agent workflows can be realized as five practical patterns: Independent, Sequential, Joint, Hierarchical, Broadcast.
What To Try In 7 Days
Prototype a Planner + Task Queue to decompose one recurring business process.
Wrap three narrow agents (e.g., Coder, Architect, Tester) and test a Joint workflow on a small coding task.
Add a Toolbox Refiner to limit tool list and measure tool-selection stability.
Agent Features
Memory
Planning
Tool Use
Frameworks
Is Agentic
Yes
Architectures
Collaboration
Reproducibility
Risks & Boundaries
Limitations
No quantitative experiments or benchmarks are reported to validate effectiveness.
Framework assumes access to reliable external tools/APIs for many workflows.
When Not To Use
Safety-critical systems requiring formal guarantees and audit trails beyond heuristic verification.
Environments with no stable APIs or tools to perform external actions.
Failure Modes
Agent hallucination leading to incorrect actions or tool calls.
Wrong agent selection due to imperfect matchers or ambiguous personas.